UKRAINE · POLAND · EUROPEA publication by Mitchell Strategic Solutions Group
MSSG News

Defence. Technology. European security.

From the field
Original reporting

Octava Defence: the economics of a wider-area acoustic sensor network

Ivan Dvoilenko described an affordable detection approach at MSPO. The interview explains the proposition without supplying independent performance results.

Octava Defence: the economics of a wider-area acoustic sensor network
  • MSPO 2026
  • Octava Defence
Original interview with Octava Defence at MSPO 2026. Martin Mycielski / MSSG, frame from the original MSPO interview · Image source

Watch the video

Open the original publication

At MSPO, Octava Defence’s Ivan Dvoilenko described a network of acoustic sensors intended to support detection over a wide area. His account linked the technology to affordability and to passing information onward to command or warning systems.

The interview was first published in MSSG’s supplier video on 11 September. It records the company’s approach, not an independent test. MSSG has not measured its detection performance, false-alarm rate or coverage.

That boundary matters because a sensor specification and a functioning warning service are different propositions. Information must move beyond the sensing point and be interpreted in a way that is useful to the recipient.

Cost belongs to the whole service

Our analysis is that affordability should be evaluated across the delivered system, rather than from the price of a single sensing unit. Installation, communication, maintenance and the handling of outputs can affect the practical cost of a service.

The interview does not provide a complete cost model, so we do not calculate a cost per protected area or compare it numerically with other technologies. Dvoilenko’s statement establishes the economic objective the company is pursuing.

Another frame from the original MSSG interview. The complete film is embedded above.
Another frame from the original MSSG interview. The complete film is embedded above.Martin Mycielski / MSSG · Source

Integration without unsupported comparisons

Acoustic sensing should not be presented as a universal replacement for other sensor types on the basis of an exhibition conversation. A buyer needs to understand the intended role of a product and the evidence for that role in a defined setting.

Likewise, forwarding information to a command or alert system raises integration and responsibility questions. The exact interface and service commitments belong in a technical discussion with the supplier. The public interview is not a system-design specification.

Wartime development pressure

In another MSSG interview, Dvoilenko emphasised the speed of decisions and product changes in Ukraine. That experience helps explain why timely feedback matters, but urgency itself does not prove effectiveness. Both schedule and evidence need attention.

This is a focused expansion of our existing MSPO reporting. The original film is embedded, and no new test results or customer orders are inferred. The useful next question is what the supplier can document for the particular service a buyer needs.

Sources & context

  1. MSSG: original MSPO interviews, published 11 September 2026
  2. MSSG: original interviews published 10 September 2026

Published by Mitchell Strategic Solutions Group. See our editorial standards and corrections policy. Read more →

MSPO 2026Octava DefenceSensors