Beyond the stand: suppliers, permits and certification
Four MSPO conversations show the work that remains after a defence product reaches the exhibition hall.
- MSPO interviews
- Suppliers · permits · certification
Watch the video
MSSG asked OMAG, ScreenTech, Ekolot Aerospace & Defense and Octava Defence about the obstacles they face. Their answers cover regulatory work, sourcing and the cost of delivering a capability.
Agnieszka Urbańczyk from OMAG described the time and legal work involved in military-production permissions. Luis Edgardo Zapata Lopez of Ekolot discussed certification delays and support found locally in Poland. These are their experiences, not a comparison of regulatory systems.
Maksym Kostenko from ScreenTech said the team was seeking alternatives to Chinese suppliers of cameras, motors and propellers. That gives European component manufacturers a concrete starting point for a conversation, without establishing that a contract is available.
Ivan Dvoilenko of Octava Defence explained work on networks of acoustic sensors aimed at affordable detection over a wide area. The interview records the company approach; MSSG has not independently measured its performance.
The interviews were published by MSSG on 11 September. They show why evaluating a product also means asking about supply, permissions, certification and support.
OMAG: manufacturing experience and new formal requirements
Agnieszka Urbańczyk discussed the time needed for military-production permissions and the importance of legal support. Her account shows that industrial experience does not automatically include every requirement of a new market. One company’s experience does not establish a universal licensing timetable.
A transition from civilian to defence applications requires more than a product-development schedule. Companies also need to identify which activities and products face requirements and who owns the documentation. This is our interpretation, not a complete legal procedure for every type of business.
ScreenTech: a specific supply-chain need
Maksym Kostenko named cameras, motors and propellers as areas where ScreenTech seeks alternatives to Chinese supply. That gives European manufacturers a more specific starting point than a general partnership invitation. The interview identifies component categories; it does not confirm signed contracts.
Changing suppliers requires assessment of compatibility, repeatability and effects on the final product. A European alternative cannot be assumed to fit without further work. Establishing the specification and responsibility is a more useful opening than sending an undifferentiated catalogue.
Ekolot: certification time belongs in the plan
Luis Edgardo Zapata Lopez described delays associated with requirements and certification, alongside support found in Poland. These were his experiences. They do not establish that a particular product already has every approval or that one fast-track process covers the whole sector.
For a buyer, compliance status needs to be connected to the product version and intended use. Readiness for a demonstration differs from readiness for delivery on specified terms. Those stages affect schedule credibility even when the underlying technology works.
Octava Defence: the cost of wider-area detection
Ivan Dvoilenko described a network of acoustic sensors intended to pass detection information to command or alert systems. He explained an economic objective and a high-level architecture; MSSG has not independently measured the network’s performance.
For an end user, the sensor signal forms part of a service that also needs transmission, interpretation and an effective warning. We do not publish unsupported ranges or false-alarm rates. Nor do we treat acoustics as a universal replacement for other sensors.
The shared industrial question
The companies identified different dependencies affecting delivery: permissions, components, certification and system cost. Our assessment is that these deserve attention as early as headline product specifications, connecting a promising demonstration to a realistic next-stage plan.
This is reporting from Martin Mycielski’s conversations, not a representative market survey. The video records the interviewees; the additional analysis explains the industrial significance without inventing contracts or trial results.
Sources & context
Published by Mitchell Strategic Solutions Group. See our editorial standards and corrections policy. Read more →
