Ekolot at MSPO: certification time is part of product readiness
Luis Edgardo Zapata Lopez described delays and local support in Poland. The interview raises a delivery question beyond the exhibition display.

- MSPO 2026
- Ekolot
Watch the video
Ekolot Aerospace & Defense’s Luis Edgardo Zapata Lopez spoke to MSSG about certification-related delays and support found locally in Poland. The account appeared in our MSPO supplier video, first published on 11 September.
The subject is not a minor administrative detail. For a prospective buyer, the date when a product can be shown and the date when it can be supplied for a defined use may differ. A credible delivery plan needs to explain that gap.
The interview describes the speaker’s experience. It does not establish a current certificate list for every Ekolot product, a universal approval timetable or a fast-track procedure available to the whole industry.
Readiness needs a defined use
Our analysis is that compliance status has to be connected to the actual configuration and intended use. A broad statement that a company is certified may conceal distinctions between products, versions or activities. The buyer should ask what document applies to the offered delivery.
This is particularly relevant to dual-use businesses because different customers can be asking for different things. A civil application and a military procurement should not be assumed to share every requirement merely because the underlying equipment is related.

Support and the schedule
Zapata Lopez also described local support in Poland. That is part of his account, not evidence that every obstacle was removed. Assistance can help a company navigate a process without determining the final outcome or its timing.
A supplier and its partner should therefore separate completed milestones from applications and remaining dependencies. The commercial plan becomes clearer when both sides know what is already documented and what must still happen before delivery.
Avoiding an unsupported Ukraine claim
In a separate MSSG conversation about working with Ukraine, the speaker stated that Ekolot was not working with Ukraine at that time. We preserve that boundary. A discussion of wartime dual-use technology is not the same as a report of an existing Ukrainian contract.
This article expands our recorded MSPO reporting. MSSG has not audited the company’s certificates or verified subsequent approvals. The original film remains available so that readers can distinguish the interviewee’s statements from our analysis of their implications.
Sources & context
- MSSG: original MSPO interviews, published 11 September 2026 ↗
- MSSG: original interviews published 10 September 2026 ↗
Published by Mitchell Strategic Solutions Group. See our editorial standards and corrections policy. Read more →




